Oswald acted alone...end of story.
LBJ was a crook.
No, he didn’t. Oswald was a patsy for those who really killed Kennedy
I agree. The info at this link only makes that case further.
Oswald acted alone...end of story.
__________________________________
Agreed!
Bang...4.8 seconds...Bang...0.7 seconds...Bang
Proves Oswald could not possibly have been the only shooter.
I agree with you but I’m curious about something. The Carcano rifle has a 6 round magazine capacity. Of course less if converted to 8 mm as many were by the Germans, but this was a 6.5.
How many, if any, cartridges remained in the mag well after he put it down and left the depository? Presumably they looked for ejected brass as well. It is my understanding that he had time to make only three shots, even though he was an experienced shooter.
Again we’re talking about proof and not conjecture.
The fact that Oswald acted alone would not preclude a separate entity from controlling him. He could be the lone shooter controlled by clandestine operatives of the FBI or the CIA, or LBJ. One never knows
Dead wrong, but I’m sure you sleep well at night regardless.
Wrong! Latest information indicates that there were at least two shooters: two different types of bullets were
in evidence.
I will bet YOU any amount of money you want to loose that you are wrong.
Here is HOW you prove the US government lied about what happened. There are TWO WAYS to time the shots that killed JFK. One way is universally accepted as valid. The second way has been attacked viciously by the US government and the lap dog media as being invalid. Before you decide whether the gov't and the media are right, consider that a recent book shows that the times are the same between shots in BOTH methods which means statistically that both are valid.
So how does the book do what others have failed to do? Mistakes and lies surround the information that hides the truth about the JFK assassination. At this point in the discussion, consider the possibility that the US government was involved in the assassination. If the government was involved, then EVERYTHING the government provided as evidence would have to be viewed as suspect. The trick to getting the right answers is to use information that the US government could not have forged.
This video in about 10 minutes shows what the verbage above actually means. You will notice that several of the shots that can be identified in the Zapruder film match the timing in the other evidence. That brings up the question: What is the probability that audio experts looking at information from random noise could guess the timing of movements seen in the Zapruder film? The quick answer is there isn't a chance in he((. What that means is that you have been lied to because when you compare this analysis to the official "story" only one can be right. If the timing argument is correct, it means that significant amounts of evidence supplied by the US government was forged to obviously to hide the truth.
When you look at the forged evidence, the scumbag conspirators fingerprints are all over it. You surely know the FBI confiscated the Dallas evidence; therefore, they are the only ones who could have forged, destroyed and lied to create this "mystery." It has never been a mystery, it has always been a lie.
You'll notice that the argument above says that only one "scenario" can be right. Fools like Vince Bugliosi in RECLAIMING HISTORY are looking to find scenarios that are consistent with the evidence the gubermint supplied when the actual solution is that the actual shooting sequence exposes the US government's fraud.
It will take a while for Americans to finally accept that they have been made to look like total fools. The government found a half century ago that if it can fool the press, you can fool Americans. The JFK shows put on television in the last few weeks are a presentation of lies, half truths and guesses. Not one scenario they talk about is correct.
So Oswald was a treasury agent?