[Ole Okie]

Even the Ivy League dimwits couldn’t even know the difference between “lose” and “loose”.

I think we're seeing evolution of the language. "Lose" becomes "Loose" in about two thirds of the usage I see.

Don't know what "Loose" evolves to; it probably won't be "Looose".

Perhaps "untight" will take the place of loose.

[Still Thinking]

Perhaps "untight" will take the place of loose.

And if something's really really loose (like loooooooooose), will that make it double-plus-untight?