Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: papertyger

Now we’re back to Scripture proving Scripture. That’s how. If one’s interpretation contradicts Scripture as stated over and over again (not removed from its context) contradicts Scripture...guess who’s wrong. (Clue: Since Scripture IS the only authority, that would be the one who is wrongly interpreting it, not Scripture itself.)

As for “protection” from sin, who said He was some kind of life vest? He guides, but no I don’t think I ever stated one was COMPELLED, but it’s a strange sort of Christian who would not want to.... Again, since we are ALL sinful creatures, we will never be sinless on this Earth. None of us (and yes, that includes Mary). Only one was and is sinless in human form and that’s Christ.


75 posted on 11/21/2013 7:27:26 PM PST by JLLH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies ]


To: JLLH
Now we’re back to Scripture proving Scripture.

Have you ever had a doctrinal discussion with a Jehovah's Witness? They do exactly that, and with the same alacrity of most Protestants I might add.

It doesn't make them right.

79 posted on 11/21/2013 7:32:10 PM PST by papertyger ("refusing to draw an inescapable conclusion does not qualify as a 'difference of opinion.'")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson