Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Mamzelle

‘’threw’’, ‘’who interestingly were not’’.:-)


35 posted on 11/17/2013 10:59:08 AM PST by jmacusa (I don't think so, but I doubt it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]


To: jmacusa

“Who, interestingly, were not” is one way—but you can leave the commas out if you have two of them in this kind of construction. I have no excuse for all the other errors. I changed cracks to “cracka” three times, and the machine keeps editing me.


41 posted on 11/17/2013 11:04:23 AM PST by Mamzelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson