You are good at asking for links and capitalizing FACTS—why don’t you try bringing some additional facts of your own to the ball-game.
Yeah, if Chicago hits the apocalypse, things will be bad, but if you want to back up someone who says that Chicago is NEXT, why don’t you produce some statistics showing that the apocalypse has actually begun.
>> why don’t you produce some statistics showing that the apocalypse has actually begun.
Huh? Nonsense. YOU are the one who called out the author, and cast doubt on him. I am agreeing with the author presented in the OP (and his facts) and disagreeing with you. The burden is on YOU to present the countervailing statistics.
>> why don’t you produce some statistics showing that the apocalypse has actually begun.
Okay. Detroit. Or don’t you understand the meaning of “apocalypse”?