Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MUDDOG

Some companies might engage and pursue this. Most will ask how it’d work, and worry about turning this around so quick. A figure on the numbers? That’s the real issue. Usually, you’d have two or three months to toss the numbers around and reach a conclusion over next year’s rates.

The problem I see...what if half the companies say “no”? Even if five percent say no....you’ve got a big mess.


22 posted on 11/14/2013 8:56:23 AM PST by pepsionice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: pepsionice
Usually, you’d have two or three months to toss the numbers around and reach a conclusion over next year’s rates.

That's what I figured -- months to do it.

In the meantime people's plans are expiring.

I agree, it would be a big administrative mess.

52 posted on 11/14/2013 9:01:42 AM PST by MUDDOG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

To: pepsionice

And who is going to compensate the companies for all of the time and paper involved in this fiasco?

If the insurance companies don’t comply, they’ll surely be blamed for everything.

And just how long is the extension? Until the 2014 elections are over and nobody has to worry?


145 posted on 11/14/2013 9:49:34 AM PST by JudyinCanada
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson