Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: JediJones
But I don’t think they’d find it advantageous to do so for middle and higher-income people who would have the options to seek employment from a competitor.

They have no choice. If they do it for one group they will do it across the board. Check the Wall Street Journal, they had an article about it today. I've heard the same thing from an executive at a large company. When it starts it will be to late to reverse course, that's why the employer mandate got pushed back.

85 posted on 11/13/2013 3:38:56 PM PST by wmfights
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies ]


To: wmfights

I’m saying if a company largely has lower-income employees they will do it but not if they’re largely stagged with middle-to-upper-income types. Just like the companies with lower-income employees have been cutting them back to under 30 hours now, but not companies with a more educated and higher paid workforce.


87 posted on 11/13/2013 3:48:52 PM PST by JediJones (The #1 Must-see Filibuster of the Year: TEXAS TED AND THE CONSERVATIVE CRUZ-ADE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson