Except for the military, and immigration, the constitution does not say the fed has anything to do those other items.
Every state has its own laws regarding divorce, adoption, etc, and that is as it should be-some states are community property states, some are not, etc.
I’m not a political science major and I didn’t stay at a Holiday Inn last night-but I do understand the constitution, and I want to see it heeded and used.
I don’t care if it leans to the left or right, a nanny state is just that, meddling and micromanaging where it clearly should not, and using OUR money to do it...
So federal law applies to homosexuality, and so does state law, and you agree that is necessary.
Other than that, you just want to make the same general statements, and pretend that libertarianism is not pushing a leftist agenda of homosexuality, abortion, open borders and so on.