Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Fledermaus

Sarvis was the libertarian candidate, you cannot make him not that, just because you didn’t line up with him 100%.

Frankly, why anyone here is defending a pro-abortion, pro-drugs, pro-homosexual agenda third party candidate, is very puzzling to me.


93 posted on 11/05/2013 10:59:03 PM PST by ansel12 ( Democrats-"a party that since antebellum times has been bent on the dishonoring of humanity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies ]


To: ansel12

Candidate, yes. Really libertarin, no.


96 posted on 11/05/2013 11:03:57 PM PST by Fledermaus (If we here in TN can't get rid of the most worthless Lamar, it's over.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies ]

To: ansel12
Sarvis was the libertarian candidate, you cannot make him not that, just because you didn’t line up with him 100%.

Sarvis was the Libertarian candidate. Kindly get your capitalization right.

In terms of his positions, he was basically a liberal Democrat. The Donks installed him in the race in hopes the Libertarian brand would peel off enough idiot GOP voters to swing the race to McAuliffe. It worked, albeit with a much thinner margin than they hoped.

101 posted on 11/05/2013 11:15:24 PM PST by cynwoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson