Posted on 11/05/2013 8:50:48 AM PST by Anila
Has the greatest mind of the last 30 years finally lost his marbles? Worse, did it happen because he read my book, “White Girl Bleed a Lot: The Return of Racial Violence to America and How the Media Ignore it”?
That is what I wondered immediately after reading one of Thomas Sowell’s latest columns that questioned whether are in the midst of a race war. He cited “White Girl Bleed a Lot” as proof positive of an epidemic of unacknowledged racial violence across the country: more than 500 examples in more than 100 cities. All documented. Many on video.
The first time Sowell wrote about “White Girl Bleed a Lot,” he said he had no idea black mob violence was so widespread until he read my book. That was a year ago. Today, I say I had no idea how pervasive the problem was when Sowell said that.
In his second column about “White Girl Bleed a Lot,” Sowell said: “Initial skirmishes in that race war have already begun, and have in fact been going on for some years. But public officials pretend that it is not happening, and the mainstream media seldom publish it at all, except in ways that conceal what is really taking place. …
“Some of these many attacks are covered in detail in a book titled, ‘White Girl Bleed A Lot’ by Colin Flaherty.”
Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2013/11/america-waking-up-to-race-war/#YDTMMtpYK4s64Kz7.99
(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
Yikes. Good luck. We thought about Cal-Tech but no way. Perhaps IF she wishes for graduate work but we were even worried about Georgia Tech . . . right near Downtown Atlanta. And up North, MIT, no way. She is about 4 hours away as it is now and the other choices way too far.
Some of those classes are difficult enough as it is, one professor, emailed before classes even started this summer, assignment due first day, test second day . . . and he even said he had ICE WATER running through is veins. YIKES. Poor kid.
You either read almost nothing on FR or you're lying. At this point only someone unbelievably ill-informed or lying could think that 0bastard didn't mean to incite a race war and is extremely racist and hateful himself.
This is a fact, and they've started already, and the msm/gov is ignoring it and thus enabling and helping it along.
Eric Holder...definitely a racist. No doubt about that one
You are another "either unbelievably ill-informed or lying". I'm starting to wonder about motives here... Obastard NOT racist??? He says he is (well, Ayers has him say it) in "his" "autobiography".
Yep. Everyone who doesn't agree with you 100% is either stupid or a liar.
What we also have is a significant portion of the white community that openly approves of this activity, and an even more sizable portion willing to cover it up or explain it away under the influence of guilt and a conviction that the victims deserve it so long as it isn't themselves. This part is the sickest facet of progressive ideology.
Voiceless in all of this is the largest community of victims of this ideologically-spawned culture of violence, and that community is black; specifically, young black men are both the most prevalent perpetrators and the most prevalent victims of this toxic manifestation of societal "change". The ones who should be speaking up for them are the Jesse Jacksons and the Al Sharptons, who are far more interested in shaking down the white community than in stanching the real bleeding. For them Trayvon was an ideal symbol. What they pretend to protest in Trayvon is the defense of his innocence. What they actually protest is the denial of his ability to do violence with impunity. There is nothing in this campaign that has anything to do with racial comity - it's all about glorifying and justifying the violence. These "leaders" are promoting the war. Through aggressive political efforts they have placed one of their own in the White House and expect to profit from it. So far they haven't done badly.
But they don't really want a full-blown race war. They know the numbers. What they want is a continuing low-level conflict wherein the parent society, black and white, will pay the Danegeld to the violent minority on a more or less permanent basis. Nice work if you can get it.
Anyone who read 10% of what I’ve read - heck, 5% - about 0bastard over the last few years would not be ignorant about his racism and how he has incited race hatred. Just what he said about the Zimmerman/Trademarkvon issue alone. It has nothing to do with “agreeing” with me, or anyone. It’s simple Reality. You know, “Objective Reality”.
For example, I want a new Ford F-150 truck. But I'm not all that motivated to get it. There are other things I want more. So I guess that I REALLY don't want that truck all that much.
Now consider Obama. Racial division suits his purpose. He likes racial division. But he's not all that motivated to get it. He'd rather be loved by the adoring media. He'd rather go golfing than provoke a racial war.
True revolutionaries do not act that way. Hitler, Mao, and Stalin did not go golfing. They applied brute force, and they took chances to achieve their revolutionary goals.
Obama has done of that. His selfish little goals are more important to him than tearing the races apart. That is why I believe he's not REALLY interested in a race war. If he was, he'd be a hell of a lot more active in trying to achieve that goal.
Bottom line, IMHO. Obama is a punk. But he is not a race war revolutionary. That would take more effort than he's willing to give.
Well he sure seems to know where the hot buttons are. One Trayvon is worth a million nameless black pity partiers.
He sure does. But Obama is lazy and risk-adverse. He'll make the easy "Trayvon could be my son" speech, but he won't go all-out demanding that Zimmerman be federally prosecuted.
A President who REALLY wanted to tear the races apart would have gone all-out. He would have ordered the FBI to arrest Zimmerman. He would have used an Executive order to ban the Confederate flag.
As I posted earlier, Obama is a punk. He might dream of a race war, but his actions show he really doesn't want one.
Obama isn’t as evil as he could be.
Still, what little sense remains in Washington as a whole is keeping him from doing that. Also he may feel that being too evil too quick would engender a backlash.
DINGDINGDING!
Absolutely. These people's worst nightmare is having to run something on a level playing field.
I have no clue why you underestimate him and “him” includes his handlers, mentors, funders, string pullers. People like Jarrett, Ayers and the other hardcore racist/moslem/thugs/psychopaths he surrounds himself with.
Obastard is full of hatred, vengefulness and utter nastiness of every kind. But because of his brain damage from drugs, likely continuing drug use, and his homosexual life (who knows what diseases he has), he is a puppet. But he agrees with his handlers’ agenda 100%.
You are incredibly naive and/or ill informed.
You are completely missing my point. You say that Obama agrees with his handlers' agenda 100%. I believe that is correct. Let me say that again. I believe that is correct.
My point is that I don't believe that he is a revolutionary at heart. I could be wrong, but his actions show that he doesn't REALLY want to take the chances that need to be taken to carry out his handlers' dreams.
In many respects, Obama is just a little boy in a man's world. He will mouth the slogans, but he'd rather go golfing than lead a revolution. He doesn't want mass upheaval. His actions for six years have plainly shown that.
There's nothing more I can add to that, so I'll give you the last word if you want. Just kindly remember that insults do little advance an argument.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.