Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: C210N
There are federal laws that have been on the books for years which forbid a hospital from denying “emergency” care to *anybody*,regardless of their ability to pay.And “emergency” is defined in the law so broadly that it allows deadbeats to use the ER as a 24/7/365 walk-in clinic...which many,*many* people do on a routine basis.
13 posted on 11/04/2013 9:19:10 AM PST by Gay State Conservative (Osama Obama Care: A Religion That Will Have You On Your Knees!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: Gay State Conservative
“emergency” is defined in the law so broadly that it allows deadbeats to use the ER as a 24/7/365 walk-in clinic...

That isn't true. Just the opposite is true. When the hospital provides the type of non-emergent care you describe it is discretionary. EMTALA definition:

An emergency medical condition is defined as "a condition manifesting itself by acute symptoms of sufficient severity (including severe pain) such that the absence of immediate medical attention could reasonably be expected to result in placing the individual's health [or the health of an unborn child] in serious jeopardy, serious impairment to bodily functions, or serious dysfunction of bodily organs." For example, a pregnant woman with an emergency condition must be treated until delivery is complete, unless a transfer under the statute is appropriate.[9] --wiki

26 posted on 11/04/2013 12:01:29 PM PST by steve86 (Some things aren't really true but you wouldn't be half surprised if they were.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson