Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Soul of the South
A winner would have had a game plan for every precinct in the nation. He and his team would have identified where fraud was likely to occur and would have manned the polling places susceptible to fraud with poll watchers and attorneys. At the first sign of fraud his attorneys would have been in front of a judge.

I agree 100%.

The more I think about it the more I believe the powers behind the scenes determined Obama would win the 2008 and 2012 elections. Romney and McCain were selected because they agreed to go through the motions and lose gracefully.

Agree, again. Look at the tough fight W put up, in 2000. Where was that ground game, with Romney?

39 posted on 11/02/2013 8:39:28 PM PDT by Jane Long (While Marxists continue the fundamental transformation of the USA, progressive RINOs assist!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]


To: Jane Long

“Look at the tough fight W put up, in 2000. Where was that ground game, with Romney?”

The ground game could have been spearheaded by passionate Tea Party activists, fresh off a very successful 2010 Congressional campaign, who Romney refused to embrace.

Winning executives in the corporate world quickly learn to leverage assets. Romney refusing help from the Tea Party was the equivalent of the CEO of floundering company firing his best financial people the day before filing for bankruptcy and replacing them with workers from a temp agency.

Perhaps Romney’s reputation as a powerful executive was a mirage.


43 posted on 11/03/2013 7:17:37 AM PST by Soul of the South (Yesterday is gone. Today will be what we make of it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson