Nothing is more important than defending the Constitution, including the Article II natural born Citizen requirement for POTUS.
The Supreme Court of the United States has never applied the term “natural born citizen” to any other category than “those born in the country of parents who are citizens thereof”.
"The citizenship of no man could be previous to the declaration of independence, and, as a natural right, belongs to none but those who have been born of citizens since the 4th of July, 1776."....David Ramsay, 1789.
A Dissertation on Manner of Acquiring Character & Privileges of Citizen of U.S.-by David Ramsay-1789
Obama's refusal to prove his eligibility has unfortunately become the main issue of such a good Ted Cruz/Tea Party article. Let's stop with the implications that Birthers/Constitutionalists should have a problem with Ted Cruz's eligibility to become President of the United States when there is no problem since he's as eligible as John McCain.
Perhaps this article title's ending in brackets was to bait Constitutionalists?
What a shame that SoConPubbie would actually try to pin constitutionalists against Ted Cruz on a false premise that Senator Cruz is as ineligible as Barack Hussein Obama when the opposite is true.
I AM a Birther and do NOT see how one can imply that Ted Cruz has an eligibilty problem like Obama. I am also a Ted Cruz supporter and because of that I'm offended that he be placed in the same category as Barack Hussein Obama especially if it's to create contraversy with the objective to pin Constitutional Conservatives against him before the Primaries even start.
Perhaps some people dislike "birthers" more than they like Cruz. So sad. The last thing I wish to see is another candidate McCain in 2016 because of manufacturing a crisis against a good man like Senator Ted Cruz.
The real story here is: Ted Cruz could ride Tea Party support to White House
Not birtherism.