Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: arthurus
The pure psychopath is less damaging

Yep. Clinton, at least, had the sense to read the political tea leaves. He could tell which way the wind was blowing.

I loathed the man, however, I don't think he was actively bent on the destruction of this country. Of course, unlike the Kenyan, he was born here so he had a bit of a vested interest.

61 posted on 10/30/2013 6:24:53 AM PDT by wbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]


To: wbill

Clinton was actively bent on his own self promotion. As a psychopath he has no feeling for the country or for anything else, only for himself. Clinton and the kenyan are both narcissisists but the kenyan is probably not a psychopath. He sticks to one goal and follows another’s directions because he has accepted that the other knows how to do it. Can you imagine Clinton with a Valerie Jarrett? Clinton might follow a VJ so long as it personally benefits him but would dump her as soon as her lead no longer immediately benefits him. A psychopath manipulates others. A kenyan allows himself to be manipulated by others so long as he can maintain his lifestyle as a perfumed prince and the ideological goal is inn sight.


76 posted on 10/30/2013 11:46:47 AM PDT by arthurus (Read Hazlitt's Economics In One Lesson ONLINEhttp://steshaw.org/economics-in-one-lesson/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson