Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: xzins

I am going to drop this discussion. I do not see how it can be of any benefit to Conservatives or to the Nation to continue it.

Cruz is the best Leader we’ve seen since Sarah Palin, and he’s the only one that seems willing to put up a fight.

I can honestly say I don’t care whether or not he meets the original meaning of Article II, he is the only reasonable choice at this point, and the Democrats didn’t care about the rules anyway.

I still believe my argument is correct, and that given sufficient time I could convey the reasoning and evidence necessary to establish it, but as I said, it is contrary to our best interests and those of our nation, so I feel obligated to just drop it.

I would go further and suggest that we all solicit Jim Robinson to direct moderators to reject any future eligibility threads which focus on Ted Cruz. I see no way in which discussing the topic is beneficial to our movement or our goals.


954 posted on 11/01/2013 12:11:36 PM PDT by DiogenesLamp (Partus Sequitur Patrem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 918 | View Replies ]


To: DiogenesLamp; butterdezillion

I understand your reluctance to participate in Cruz eligibility threads. It’s a Damocles sword endeavor for those honestly struggling with his eligibility. FR’s the best place to discuss it and the worst place to discuss it.

The good in it is:

1. Getting at the facts and the best way to present them.

2. Honing our swords in case the democrats attack, IF Cruz decides to declare candidacy.

3. Identifying those who are trolls on the subject instead of searchers.


972 posted on 11/01/2013 1:30:41 PM PDT by xzins ( Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! Those who truly support our troops pray for victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 954 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson