[SoConPubbie]

There is a mountain of it. Far more proof than supports the jus soli claim.

Prove it, in context. Don't cherry pick your proof like most do on this issue.

Provide the rock-solid evidence, that removes all doubt, that to be President it requires two US Citizen Parents at birth. Prove it from the US Constitution, US Law, or Supreme Court ruling that proves your contention.

[DiogenesLamp]

Prove it, in context.

How much time do you want to spend on it?

Don't cherry pick your proof like most do on this issue.

How about this? Let us first agree as to who would be most in a position to know the correct answer to the "natural born citizen" question.

I argue that only the Delegates to the US Constitutional convention, and the subsequent ratifiers in the State ratifying conventions, knew exactly what it was that they intended with that article II provision. (i.e. the Lawmakers.)

I argue that any statements by actual Delegates or Ratifying legislators, constitute the best actual authority regarding what was their intentions in passing that requirement.

I further argue, that any citation of authority ought to demonstrate some linkage to the delegates or ratifying legislatures, or it can only be regarded as merely hearsay from people who were not there.

Do these seem like agreeable terms to you?