It would have never passed SCOTUS 'unless' worded as a tax....which is exactly how the wording was changed and defined in order to be considered acceptable.....it's the news and Administration calling it "anything" else.
This guy is still trying to sell this “law of the land”
It’s NOT the law of the land for big business campaign contributors, congress and their staffs, and other cronies.
Bingo
And on that basis should be challenged as it’s not applied equally, especially when considered to be a tax.....
“This guy is still trying to sell this “law of the land””
Yeah, Bozo, the immigration laws are the laws of the land too, but you choose to not enforce them!
It would have never passed SCOTUS 'unless' worded as a tax....which is exactly how the wording was changed and defined in order to be considered acceptable.....it's the news and Administration calling it "anything" else.