the rule base shouldn’t be a big deal ... and can be done almost in parallel by teams of people
the core system interfacing to the users would also be trivial.
hell, during the same week they barely got 50,000 thru their system... a system I’ve got running at home was managing numerous requests, live, for 200k+ across the US and the EU. 200k+ unique people... multiple requests each.
all on a win7pro box that I got from a Panasonic division shutdown for $200.
I could easily get their bs running... or at least design / coordinate the teams to bing it together... but then I’d be no better then 0failure and crew.
sorry, but I won’t help bury my country for any price. unfortunately, there are many that will. principal and integrity are in short supply these days
Nice that your so confidant, but I doubt it. It has to interface with a dozen fed systems and some of the data it needs is in flat files....
I’m an attorney and a code jockey. The legislation is incomprehensible. The regulation is worse. How do you get usable requirements from a web of interconnected, cross-referenced, external law referenced, and intentionally vaguely written liberal fantasy law that nobody gets except their personal favorite parts? That’s where the rule base is going to come from? Not likely. No doubt that’s where at least some of the garbled data is coming from for the insurers. Other data issues are probably based on trying to match fields in assorted remote dbs that have a myriad of different normalizations, and fields that should match have the data in incompatible formats. But nothing is so irresolvable as unknowable requirements.