I could go along with that, although the value of doing so is probably much, much less than the cost.
Also, if that rock later on DID harm somebody, I would expect the government to pay dearly for having not only tolerated such a dangerous situation but for having caused it to be re-created.
Respectfully disagree.
Use of national parks means assumed risk. It’s not the government’s fault if I get eaten by a bear, trapped in an avalanche or die of hypothermia. At least around here the idiots who need to be rescued after ignoring posted warnings get charged for the cost of their rescue.