Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: All
More:

*********************************EXCERPT*******************************************

cptacek on October 18, 2013 at 11:12 AM

Which is why they only hired “trusted campaign tech experts” instead of people who actually knew what they were doing.

txhsmom on October 18, 2013 at 11:15 AM

55 posted on 10/18/2013 10:37:22 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]


To: All
More:

***********************************EXCERPT**************************************

What does this even mean? Congress can’t subpoena “trusted campaign tech experts”? What law/rule is that?

cptacek on October 18, 2013 at 11:12 AM

They can subpoena them, but presumably, they will be more willing to lie to congress, and even if they’re unwilling to technically commit perjury for their masters, they would still be much more inclined to filibuster and give evasive and deceptive answers, and be willing to embarrass themselves to protect the administration. Outside contractors would have much more incentive to be candid, and not just to the minimum extent required by law.

RINO in Name Only on October 18, 2013 at 11:23 AM

56 posted on 10/18/2013 10:39:12 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson