[Dilbert San Diego]

I wondered that too.

I know the liberals are stirring the pot about American Indian nicknames again, and have targeted the Redskins, as opposed to Chiefs, Warriors, Indians, Braves, etc.

But, who the heck asked them to do this? Who is paying for it? Or is this a San Francisco liberal company, who decided to take it on themselves to support this liberal cause???

[KarlInOhio]

I know the liberals are stirring the pot about American Indian nicknames again, and have targeted the Redskins, as opposed to Chiefs, Warriors, Indians, Braves, etc.

How about the newly named Apolis Colts?

But then I'm the person who suggested that when the Miami University Redskins changed their name they should drop Miami too so that the tribe wouldn't be offended. On suggestion was the Firewater Frat Boys.

[Venturer]

My guess is Obama.

[cripplecreek]

Anti-Redskins Indian leader not a legitimate member of his tribe

[MeshugeMikey]

they have some economic interest in this clearly

self promotion

hey how about the Washington Self Promoters??

[Pecos]

D.C. is the nexus of Liberalism, government interference, and the MSM. Therefore, the Redskins were the most obvious target. You can get a reporter to cover a victimization story any day of the week and twice on Sundays because none of them go to church - too busy watching the Sunday morning “news” shows on TV.