Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: i_robot73

Ah, that’s a totally different issue.

I agree. The party doesn’t get our votes automatically. They need to earn them.

But that is a different subject altogether. It has nothing to do with making voting harder. We shouldn’t be restricting voting, we should be making sure that we nominate candidates worth voting for.

Conservatism is the better political philosophy. So long as we do it justice. That’s where our efforts should be - if we do our job then we don’t have to keep relying on low turnout to win statewide or national elections.


203 posted on 10/17/2013 6:42:07 PM PDT by highball ("I never should have switched from scotch to martinis." -- the last words of Humphrey Bogart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 202 | View Replies ]


To: highball

Restricting? Nope, open the field to any/all...best idea(s) win.

This whole B.S. ‘rules’ (5% of electorate, only XYZ on ABC, etc.) setup by the 2-party cabal are the problem


209 posted on 10/18/2013 7:15:23 AM PDT by i_robot73 (Give me one example and I will show where gov't is the root of the problem(s).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 203 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson