Not quite right. They are not enforcing certain parts of the law. Courts said they wont tell the POTUS how to enforce a law.
That is much different to the courts than IRS/justice prosecuting someone in violation of that same law they are procecuting them for.
If they try to do that then even the most liberal judges will rule to throw it out of court since the text of bill is so clear.
Lawyers will be lining up to take that first case on and beat the government.
I think talk radio like Rush simples these issues too much because these same faulty arguments are repeated over and over, and the unintended consequence is to help Obama get people to comply. I know, they are 'promoting conservatism' by confusing listeners with faulty logical connections.
I think when push comes to shove, they’re not going to throw people in jail for resisting. However, there are many things they can do to destroy lives short of jail, like freezing bank accounts and seizing property with liens. They’ll do that.
Yeah, and the IRS didn’t do anything wrong when they targeted Tea Party organizations for additional scrutiny. After all, when they didn’t target like minded marxist groups, they were just “not enforcing” that aspect of the regulations.
It’s not as if the Tea Party groups lost their first ammendment right, they just didn’t get treated as a non-profit by the IRS.
When conservatives make these issues too simplified, they are just confusing people!
/s off
If you honestly think that the IRS will change their behaviour because some nuance in the “law as passed,” then I have a bridge to sell you.