Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: nascarnation

Don’t be so sure. They crowned her so well in 2008... that was until Obama began to get above 5%. Then she went into the crapper in the eyes of the MSM.

The fact is, for all the talk about how ‘far right’ the Republicans have become, the reality is how far left the rats have become. Shillery might just not be communist enough to win the nomination with today’s rat party. She also sucks as a speaker and debater. She doesn’t have the patented “0 silver tongue + teleprompter”.
A Gillibrand run is also possible. She’s another far left nutjob.

OLoser does not like the Clintons, and being the king, he gets to hand off his side of the party to a future candidate. I doubt slowJoe, but Warren is a possibility. The moonbats will go at it like a pig on sorbet, and attack Hillary with all manner of depraved insults (many deserved).


75 posted on 10/06/2013 7:05:49 PM PDT by Viennacon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies ]


To: Viennacon

I agree if Warren gets the files on Arkancides from the Chicago mob, she can intimidate the Clintons just like Baraq did.

Agree there’s no love lost between Obama and the Clintons, but Hillary did “take one for the team” over Benghazi. That may be part of a “grand bargain”.

Since I believe “entitlements” is the key to all future POTUS elections (at least in my lifetime) I view the Dem nominee as a sure winner in Nov 16. I’m also forecasting DeVal (Baraq II) Patrick as VP.


79 posted on 10/06/2013 7:12:52 PM PDT by nascarnation (Frequently wrong but rarely in doubt....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson