“the strongest and the fittest are the ones who have the moral imperative to survive and the weak, well, if they get in the way of the “strongest and the fittest”, well then, why not simply remove the “useless eaters”. They are a drag on the state and the healthy.”
That has nothing to do with Darwin.
re: “the strongest and the fittest are the ones who have the moral imperative to survive and the weak, well, if they get in the way of the “strongest and the fittest”, well then, why not simply remove the “useless eaters”. They are a drag on the state and the healthy.”
Borges: “That has nothing to do with Darwin.”
How so? Does survival of the fittest not relate to human beings? Aren’t human beings simply another form of animal according to Darwinist naturalism?