Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

UN Climate Change Report Dismisses Slowdown in Global Warming
Fox News ^ | September 27, 2013 | Staff

Posted on 09/27/2013 1:27:45 PM PDT by lbryce

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last
The Earth has changed in “unprecedented ways” since 1950, the U.N. says, and its scientists are 95 percent certain that humans are responsible.

The Earth has changed in “unprecedented ways” since 2008, the U.N. says, and its political scientists are 95 percent certain that Americans are responsible.

That's better.

1 posted on 09/27/2013 1:27:45 PM PDT by lbryce
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: lbryce

Liberals never let go of a good scam.


2 posted on 09/27/2013 1:31:57 PM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (From time to time the tree of liberty must be watered with the blood of tyrants and patriots.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lbryce
The Earth has changed in “unprecedented ways” since 1950 . . . scientists are 95 percent certain that humans are responsible. Yet the planet has largely stopped warming over the past 15 years . . . the U.N.’s climate group could not explain why the mercury has stopped rising.

This is unprecedented. It's the first time in history that global temperatures have increased at an alarming rate, like a hockey stick, without rising.

3 posted on 09/27/2013 1:32:39 PM PDT by Pollster1 ("Shall not be infringed" is unambiguous.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lbryce

Because ignoring data is scientific!


4 posted on 09/27/2013 1:34:13 PM PDT by DaveyB ("When injustice becomes the law; rebellion becomes duty." - Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lbryce

As Rush said today, they should be thrilled about this good news. It looks like the earth’s temperature is responding to all the measures taken, which should make them relieved and proud they forced action. Unless, of course, it’s not about the earth, but all about control and money.


5 posted on 09/27/2013 1:44:52 PM PDT by JudyinCanada
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lbryce

That HUGE nuclear explosion out in space called the SUN is responsible...even if it expands a fraction - will result in sending out more heat - thus warming everything in it’s path...I wonder if there are monitoring systems in place that illustrate that occurring...if they are - the Al Gore would ignore the data...can’t blame the Sun for political agenda not passing...


6 posted on 09/27/2013 1:59:49 PM PDT by BCW (The War in Iraq - http://babylonscovertwar.com/index.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BCW

These “scientists” are bought and paid for. They are an embarrassment to the scientific method, science and scientists. Someone should take their obscure, worthless dissertations and beat them with them.


7 posted on 09/27/2013 2:02:18 PM PDT by hal ogen (First Amendment or Reeducation Camp?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: BCW

These “scientists” are bought and paid for. They are an embarrassment to the scientific method, science and scientists. Someone should take their obscure, worthless dissertations and beat them with them.


8 posted on 09/27/2013 2:02:18 PM PDT by hal ogen (First Amendment or Reeducation Camp?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: hal ogen

In many cases Ph.D. means “piled higher and deeper”.


9 posted on 09/27/2013 2:03:06 PM PDT by hal ogen (First Amendment or Reeducation Camp?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: lbryce

They can’t explain “why”?

Maybe it’s because they never explained anything in the first place. I contend that the IPCC is responsible for Global Warming. End them now!


10 posted on 09/27/2013 2:08:03 PM PDT by eyedigress ((zOld storm chaser from the west)/ ?s)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lbryce
The only thing that would be unprecedented would be if nothing changed. Everything in the universe is in a constant state of flux. Everything 'changes'. With respect to atmospheric temperatures, there are only two possible avenues of change, that is, either up or down. It is crazy to believe that atmospheric temperatures wouldn't change over a given time period. Also, the way you measure atmospheric temperature changes over time. With better techniques, you get 'better' measurement. The implication is that old methodologies were 'imperfect' and therefore not readily comparable to new readings. Basing public policy on changes in temperature over a few decades strikes me as being the height of folly.
11 posted on 09/27/2013 2:12:23 PM PDT by fhayek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lbryce

And the huge change upward in temperature since the last ice age? The one that covered most of Europe with ice?
No cars, no coal-fired plants, no home heating with oil, no planes, no boats.
And what was the source of the heat that warmed the planet to its current level?


12 posted on 09/27/2013 2:27:08 PM PDT by I want the USA back (Media: completely irresponsible traitors. Complicit in the destruction of our country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: I want the USA back

And what was the source of the heat that warmed the planet to its current level?

****************************

Dinosaurs. Really, REALLY big Dinosaurs!! Can you IMAGINE the size of a TyRex dump? And what about the gas? OMG can you IMAGINE the METHANE in a Tyronnasaurus fart?

We are all damn lucky there was no such thing as hard boiled eggs and saurkraut back then.


13 posted on 09/27/2013 2:53:45 PM PDT by billyboy15
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: lbryce

You don’t need facts or data when the Three Global Warming Amigos are involved (Mann, Jones and Hansen),


14 posted on 09/27/2013 2:54:08 PM PDT by RetiredTexasVet (Excessive numbers of coincidences are known as patterns.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: I want the USA back

Here in SW Ohio, we were once covered by a 2-mile thick glacier until it melted back to the Arctic.

What was the source of heat then? (rhetorical)

Where’s your globull warming messiah, now? (apologies to EG Robinson)


15 posted on 09/27/2013 3:04:32 PM PDT by newfreep (Breitbart sent me...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: billyboy15

There are still those even today who emit as much noxious fumes, intestinal swamp gas as any flatulent horde of dinosaurs ever could. The Kenyan’s fudge-packed k*yster immediately comes to mind.


16 posted on 09/27/2013 3:33:05 PM PDT by lbryce (Obama:The Worst Is Yet To come)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: newfreep
*Here in SW Ohio, we were once covered by a 2-mile thick glacier until it melted back to the Arctic.

What was the source of heat then? (rhetorical)*

I wouldn't be surprised if they are trying to craft a believable story about how the dinosaurs had SUV’s that were crudely made and ran on coal and that's why it was even hotter back then. That way they could “prove” that coal really is evil!

Not to mention the open parts of the Earth that let Gore's “millions of degrees” out from beneath the surface of the Earth.

17 posted on 09/27/2013 3:35:09 PM PDT by PATRIOT1876
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: PATRIOT1876

LOL - I had forgotten about OwlGore’s “millions of degrees” comment.

What a stupid kook who made hundreds of millions on a scam that common sense debunked.


18 posted on 09/27/2013 3:38:25 PM PDT by newfreep (Breitbart sent me...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: lbryce

As Rush says, if the warmists were smart, they’d claim credit for the turnaround instead of arguing with the data.


19 posted on 09/27/2013 3:51:51 PM PDT by TBP (Obama lies, Granny dies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lbryce

Well, denial is ONE way to deal with “bad news.”


20 posted on 09/27/2013 3:56:06 PM PDT by Right Wing Assault (Dick Obama is more inexperienced now than he was before he was elected.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson