Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: reaganaut

yes. instead of having this discussion, we would be fighting democrats on how much to reduce taxes by and which social program to cut and possibly the elimination of departments and the rollback and possible elimination of the EPA, ending the war on coal, approving the pipeline on top of the repeal of this monstrosity.
So, I do feel he was not as strong a conservative that most people wanted, including myself, he would have been forced to accept the will of the people because that is what the office calls for unlike Obama who doesn’t care.

We should always support the candidates that best represent the Reagan ideals but we should not take our toys and go home when our person loses. The democrats still vote when their guy loses, we pout.


875 posted on 09/27/2013 1:06:55 PM PDT by newnhdad (Our new motto: USA, it was fun while it lasted.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 865 | View Replies ]


To: newnhdad

He wasn’t a conservative AT ALL. He was a liar who would have shrugged and claimed he couldn’t do anything. He was PROUD of Obamacare and he would not have accepted the will of the people. You are living in a fantasy. Look at his record in MA, he was a ‘white and delightsome’ (to use a Book of Mormon phrase) version of Obama.

We keep losing because the GOPe knows people like you will just roll over and support any liberal RINO they put up! You are the problem, not those of us who stand up for conservatism.


900 posted on 09/27/2013 2:23:42 PM PDT by reaganaut (Ex-Mormon, now Christian. I once was lost but now am found, was blind but now I see.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 875 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson