Don’t expect him to answer. I’ve posted the same sections and he just blithely repeats his idealogically driven historical revisionism.
He does. More often than not. Not that he says much. Same old schtick.
But . . . what can he do? He has nothing else. All he can do is some idea claim-jumping, that is repeat what he knows other people already know, and hope he can slip in some of Crossan’s fallacies without anyone noticing.