There is no science behind history for one to disdain.
Did Christopher Columbus sail the Pacific Ocean in 1492? There is plenty of scientific evidence that puts this simple fact of history over the top in terms of reliability.
When you say “There is no science behind history for one to disdain”, you show yourself to be irrational. One might as well debate someone who denies Columbus’s journey. You deny the scientific evidence provided by archaeology, ancient text criticism, even carbon dating.
This would bring a rational person to start doubting your sanity, and certainly doubting the value of debating with someone so irrational.