Where have I “attacked” heresy? Which heresy?
Why have you refused to address the issues surrounding heresy I raised in post #35, this thread?
By “attack” do you mean any criticism of which you do not approve?
Why do you refuse to give a straight answer to a simple question?
Why do you refuse to give a straight answer to a simple question?
***because simple, honest, straight answers give up too much strategic position in this form of argumentium ad absurdum, or whatever it is.
If it isn't being attacked I can't be defending it, and there wasn't any reason to ask about defending it in the first place.
I didn't see any "issues" raised in #35. You simply didn't like the meaning I attributed to "heresy", but did not offer any argument or evidence that the one I'd used is different that the one being attributed to it by the author of the article.