Posted on 09/20/2013 4:29:03 AM PDT by spirited irish
Another false accusation, which you have provided no quotes to prove.
It’s there on this thread for all lurkers to see, heretic “wanna play fetch” troll.
Must be a full moon, Kevmo is howling like an insane wolf.
No evidence ever presented.
Accusations are all that's necessary for Kevmo.
Produce evidence to justify even one of your insane accusations.
FRiend, any shame here is all yours.
Do you want me to go back and look up the post where you blamed me for it?
I've only noted what you told us, that you were asked to bring this thread to News/Activism, something you supposed yours truly, BroJoeK was somehow involved in.
Are you now changing your original story?
Do you consider any disagreement with your POV in its every subtlety and nuance, to be an “attack”? Your question has been answered (by spirited irish, post #31, this thread, directed to Zionist Conspirator, but clearly known to you as evidenced by your response, post #32, wherein you sought not to illustrate why spiriteds response was inadequate, but where you seemed only to be looking for a fight.
In my experience, into the ‘50s, ‘60s, and at least half of the ‘70s, Christians tended to generally keep their own council when it came to politics, exercising their franchise perhaps to a greater degree than most others, but largely confining themselves to that activity, to Armistice Day (now Veterans’ Day), and to the occasional commemoration installing a statue or other public monument, having a certain local or national patriotic significance. All of that changed in the ‘70s (see the Moral Majority) when it became obvious to many Christians that Liberals meant to use the Regime’s power to entirely destroy the Judeo-Christian Tradition, or to at least ban it from Western Civilization, and to deny the Protestant underpinnings of our Constitution and form of government.
Now unable to defeat your protagonists in open debate, in typical liberal fashion, you seek disqualification as your means of relief.
In the meantime you flee in terror from the issues I have (repeatedly) raised:
• Are Kevmo and spirited Congress?
• Do you think that Kevmo and spirited should have something greater than their opinion behind the ideas they express?
• Or, contrarily, do you believe Kevmo’s and spirited’s ideas so repugnant that you believe the Regime’s power should be used (presumably at your direction) to suppress them?
• Is it your opinion that some opinions are simply intolerable, and that your vote should be the deciding opinion decreeing which are?
• Are Kevmo’s and spirited’s opinions more outside the boundary of Society than Phil Robertson’s? NAMBLA? The GLBT?
• Does not Joe’s observation more closely approximate a description of Liberals, Planned Parenthood, or either of the Regime’s two political parties than anything else?
No evidence ever presented.
***A lie. If you repeat the lies over and over, they become effective; a standard trolling technique. In this case, the troll is a heretic.
Produce
***For some reason, the heretic troll seems to think I am here to do his bidding. Go, fetch, jump, produce. NO. Instead, let’s play, “Get Lost, Heretic”.
There's no evidence that George Washington was gay.
But there's lots of historical evidence on our Founders' religious beliefs.
For years it was even said our Founders weren't Christians.
That's not true, they certainly were Christians, but Christians influenced to more or less degrees by ideas from deism, from Unitarianism and from Freemasonry.
If we were to name the most traditional Christian amongst our Founders, it would be John Jay, George Washington's close friend, whom he appointed as Chief Justice of the Supreme Court.
Second among the more traditional Christians would be George Washington himself, a leader in his Episcopal church.
But Washington was also a leader among Freemasons, and so must have shared some of their deistic ideas.
Amongst others -- i.e., Benjamin Franklin, John Adams, Thomas Jefferson, James Madison -- Freemasonry, deism and Unitarianism competed strongly with their basic Christianity as "core beliefs".
These are ideas that I've been attempting to defend here.
Your overwhelming contempt for these ideas strongly suggests equal contempt for our Founders, and that is a matter of some concern...
post #32, ... where you seemed only to be looking for a fight.
***He was trolling at the very beginning of this thread. Had this article been posted in the Religion Forum, his posts would have been removed. But, then we wouldn’t have been able to see the unveiling of a full-fledged Heretic.
You have produced no evidence -- zero, zip, nada -- to support any of your false accusations against me.
Sure, I agree with you, Kevmo, that Jesus would likely condemn one of us.
I'm just not certain I'm the guilty party here...
You should give that some thought.
I’m just not certain I’m the guilty party here...
***I am. Otherwise, you would have been posting on religion forums long ago. So, heretic, proceeding from my certainty, it soon becomes time to stop feeding the trolls.
T4BTT
There you go again. Get lost, Heretic.
T4BTT
yeah, didn’t really expect you to grow a pair and respond to Joe - that will never happen, silly me. Nobody’s shocked, Buddy-Boy. Merry Christmas, I truly hope you’ve been good enough to where your mommy can ensure you have at least one enjoyable, non-ranting day. XOXOXO
Produce evidence to support any of your false accusations.
Otherwise, they remain utterly false.
Accusation by question. Terrified to directly make an accusation, a question is instead asked. You do that a lot. Unable to defeat Kevmo in open debate, you instead seek relief from a third party? Or, do you labor under the misapprehension that Kevmo and spirited somehow operate under a franchise license granted by me, and that they speak only with my permission? Not hardly, Pilgrim.
I don’t know how you think any “simple words of reason” by me will do any good. You need some “simple words of reason” far more than anyone else on this thread, and they have accomplished nothing.
Kevmo: “***For some reason, the heretic troll seems to think I am here to do his bidding. Go, fetch, jump, produce. NO. Instead, let’s play, “Get Lost, Heretic”.”
Brojoke: Produce
***round & round you go, Heretic troll. I will not do your bidding. You’ve been exposed on this thread. I realize that’s uncomfortable, such evil as you promote prefers to hide in shadows. But it’s in the light now.
Luke 8:17 CEB
Common English Bible
Nothing is hidden that won’t be exposed. Nor is anything concealed that won’t be made known and brought to the light.
Well, that certainly was a lame set of insults. I can see why you are a bandwagon troll, because you need to hide behind the skirts of others.
Merry Christmas
***And Merry Christmas to you as well. We celebrate the birth of Jesus who was the jewish Messiah, and also Who was God Himself, Immanuel. So I say again to you, Merry Christmas.
Actually, I was just trying to be at least half-way FRiendly.
YHAOS: "Unable to defeat Kevmo in open debate, you instead seek relief from a third party?"
Well, then my question to you is: do you consider Kevmo to be engaging in "open debate"?
Do you consider Kevmo's posts here to be normal and acceptable in "open debate"?
Do you find no fault with Kevmo's posts?
YHAOS: "Or, do you labor under the misapprehension that Kevmo and spirited somehow operate under a franchise license granted by me, and that they speak only with my permission? Not hardly, Pilgrim."
Not in the least.
But here's what I notice: you have no reluctance -- zero, zip, nada -- to criticize whatever points you can find in the posts of yours truly, BroJoeK.
You have yet to criticize a single post from Kevmo.
Is that because you agree 100% with Kevmo, or is there some other reason?
YHAOS: "I don’t know how you think any “simple words of reason” by me will do any good."
You know, you mentioned to me years ago, and I remembered when you repeated it on this thread, that your dad was a Freemason.
And now betty boop has said the same of her dad.
I have no connection to Freemasons at all, except that one of my son-in-laws is one, and I have huge respect for our Founding Fathers, many of whom were also.
Seems to me that one cannot defend our Founders' beliefs without also defending their Freemasonry.
So I think somewhat kindly of YHAOS, even though you have not acted so kindly on this thread, and I wonder why?
YHAOS: "You need some “simple words of reason” far more than anyone else on this thread, and they have accomplished nothing."
I'll take that in good faith, and ask then: what "simple words of reason" do you imagine "have accomplished nothing"?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.