Posted on 09/20/2013 4:29:03 AM PDT by spirited irish
Good luck with that, troll. If you won’t take advice from people who have generated a typo then you’ve thrown out every single FReeper. But we all know that isn’t how things play out with you. You’re just trying to find some dig, some provocation to throw your troll shiite around. T4BTT
How many would your heretic test thrwo out?
So far on this thread, only one or two. You too can be added if you want to call yourself a Christian. I doubt you do, so you’re in the clear, simply an anticonservative antichristian troll, but not necessarily a heretic.
T4BTT, troll.
How many would your heretic test thrwo out?
***Oh my goodness, a typo. This must mean you can’t take advice from yourself. You’re really screwed now, troll.
Will that be your reason for not answering the question?
I already answered the question, troll. Oh my goodness, that’s 2 mistakes in a row for you. You definitely won’t be taking advice from yourself, then. Doubly screwed troll.
Like hell you did.
Kevmo "***And to deny that is heresy.
As the title of this thread says, Damnable Heresy."
You know, you have to be so careful on the internet in general, even on Free Republic, and even with a poster so obviously trust-worthy as Ms boop: take nothing for granted.
For example: reading Ms boop's post above (#2,001), you might suppose that what she had posted there is the actual Nicaean Creed.
It's not, it's an interpretation of the Creed, one which goes much further towards full-fledged trinitarianism than does the Creed itself.
If any are interested in scholarship, then you will be perhaps surprised to learn that full-fledged trinitarianism was not fully formed at Nicaea.
Instead it, ahem, "evolved", slowly, slowly over several centuries, until the Athenasian Creed of 500 AD.
Therefore, even Nicaea can be said, by Kevmo's exacting standards, to be "Damnable Heresy".
For examples, compared to the full-fledged Athenasian Creed (500 AD) Trinitarian "God-the-Father", at Nicaea it still retains it's comma: "God, the Father" reminding us that Jesus addressed God as his father: "abba".
None of the other Trinitarian terms "God the Son" or "God the Holy Ghost" or "trinity" itself appear at Nicaea.
Jesus is addressed as "of one being with the Father", but Nicaea doesn't yet give the Holy Ghost that same distinction:
We believe in one Lord, Jesus Christ, the only Son of God, eternally begotten of the Father, God from God, Light from Light, true God from true God, begotten, not made, of one Being with the Father.
Through him all things were made.
For us and for our salvation he came down from heaven:
by the power of the Holy Spirit he became incarnate from the Virgin Mary, and was made man.
For our sake he was crucified under Pontius Pilate; he suffered death and was buried.
On the third day he rose again in accordance with the Scriptures; he ascended into heaven and is seated at the right hand of the Father.
He will come again in glory to judge the living and the dead, and his kingdom will have no end.
We believe in the Holy Spirit, the Lord, the giver of life, who proceeds from the Father and the Son.
With the Father and the Son he is worshiped and glorified.
He has spoken through the Prophets.
We believe in one holy catholic and apostolic Church.
We acknowledge one baptism for the forgiveness of sins.
We look for the resurrection of the dead, and the life of the world to come. Amen."
Please, I'm not saying some form of trinitarianism isn't in Nicaea, only that the full-fledged Athenasian formulation of 500 AD has only partly "emerged" in Nicaea.
And if you doubt me on this, then please ask yourself: if the Nicaean Creed of 325 AD was fully complete, then why did they need another, the Athanasian Creed in 500 AD?
And if the Nicaean Creed is not fully complete in, for example, its acknowledgment of the Holy Ghost, then how is it not, in Kevmo's delightful term: "Damnable Heresy"?
I don’t need to look at something that happened 300 years later. The evidence for Jesus claiming equality with God is from the first century, not necessarily the 4th. But nice try, heretic.
I don’t need to look at something that happened 300 years later. The evidence for Jesus claiming equality with God is from the first century, not necessarily the 4th. But nice try, heretic.
But FRiend, you behavior here has shown no interest -- zero, zip, nada -- in true historicity (i.e., Crossan), and every interest in imposing your theological orthodoxy on a simple history-buff, yours truly, BroJoeK.
So your true "thoughts and intentions" are made manifest in your behavior, and I have simply described those, factually.
Of course, your descriptions of my "thoughts and intentions" are utterly false and malicious.
As I've said from the beginning, my intention here is to defend the deistic-Unitarian Christian beliefs of our Freemason Founding Fathers.
So, if that drives poor Kevmo utterly insane, well then, I'm sorry about that.
Get help, get over it, punk.
well said
Wow, that’s 3 mistakes from you, in a row.
Question asked
Mon 23 Dec 2013 06:44:24 AM PST · 2,082 of 2,090
tacticalogic to Kevmo
How many would your heretic test thrwo out?
Question Answered
Mon 23 Dec 2013 06:46:46 AM PST · 2,083 of 2,090
Kevmo to tacticalogic
So far on this thread, only one or two. You too can be added if you want to call yourself a Christian. I doubt you do, so you’re in the clear, simply an anticonservative antichristian troll, but not necessarily a heretic.
T4BTT, troll.
Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2082 | View Replies
TL makes a mistake:
Mon 23 Dec 2013 06:56:17 AM PST · 2,085 of 2,090
tacticalogic to Kevmo
Will that be your reason for not answering the question?
Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2084 | View Replies
and now TL is reiterating the same mistake. Don’t take any advice from yourself, troll.
I didn’t ask how many “on this thread”. I asked “how many”.
I'll take your words here as being full-fledged approval of Kevmo's words and behavior, that Kevmo is doing your bidding, and your dirty-work, that you agree with everything he posts, and that anything I've said about Kevmo also applies to spirited irish, right?
In short, spirited irish and Kevmo are teaming up to fill the role of Dostoyevsky's Grand Inquisitor: to question and condemn to death anyone who doesn't meet their standards of religious orthodoxy.
Please, if that's not the case, then give us something to distinguish Kevmo's howling insanity from your own more reasonable ideas.
But FRiend, you behavior here has shown no interest
***But Heretic, the behavior came after putting up with a ton of horse shiite from you. First you were outed as one who is obviously idealogically driven. Now that you’ve been outed as a heretic, I don’t have to put up with it any more if I don’t want to. I see now you’ve attracted yet another troll to your troll brigade. Time to stop feeding the trolls. T4BTT
Too late to backtrack. You made two mistakes in a row. Better not take any advice from yourself, troll.
How many, Kev? What’s the cost of satisfying your quest for ideological purity?
condemn to death
***Wow, you really have a vivid imagination.
give us something to distinguish Kevmo’s howling insanity from your own more reasonable ideas.
***better yet, heretic, you should ask yourself what Christ would do when He realized he was dealing with a false teacher. He would call you a viper, a son of the devil. Harsh, I know. But Christ was still being Christlike when Did such things and you would label His behavior as “howling insanity”.
Your question doesn’t make sense. It presumes a quest for idealogical purity. I can understand why a troll like you, who doesn’t like my idealogy litmus matrix idea, to jump to such an unwarranted conclusion. The litmus matrix thing is so that others don’t have to drill down 700 posts just to realize they’re dealing with a specific-issue troll, or a libtard RINO. Here on this thread, once I realized I was dealing with a heretic there was no chance whatsoever of what you call ideological purity, so I’m doing what Jesus did when He came across false teachers.
Oh well, nice try, troll. Maybe you should go under the bridge for a while, you’re making too many mistakes.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.