ThaT is the point of the article. Starbucks CEO relized he had to choose whose business he would rather keep, gun owners or leftists. He chose leftists and the author thinks this was the correct decision from a financial standpoint.
Starbucks is no longer a safe place to sit...it’s clearly a gun free zone. Since all of the latest mass shootings have occurred in gun free zones, why would I intentionally want to pay money to sit in a GFZ? No thanks. I value my life much more than anything Starbucks has to offer.
Maybe, but there sure are a lot of pro-2nd Amendment people out there, as MANY politicians (including two very recently) have found to their dismay.