If a young person attempts a robbery, and suffers acute catastrophic failure of the victim selection process (and picks a CCW holder, for example) then said young person could lose their entire future, not just their voting rights in that future, from such a youthful mistake.
By Paul’s logic, we should disarm everyone. Not how I roll, but that is where the logic leads.
“By Paul’s logic, we should disarm everyone”
WTF? That’s what you got out of the article?
This is a local issue in KY. They can do whatever they want.
“convicted of felonies but have not been convicted again for 5 years”
That’s the way it is here in Texas. They can also have a gun
in their home or stationary place of business. I don’t see
anyone being disarmed here.