Skip to comments.
Feds readying movie theater regulations for blind and deaf patrons
The Hill ^
| 9/15/2013
| Julian Hattem
Posted on 09/15/2013 10:47:43 PM PDT by kingattax
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-43 next last
1
posted on
09/15/2013 10:47:43 PM PDT
by
kingattax
To: kingattax
Some people should just stay home.
2
posted on
09/15/2013 10:53:00 PM PDT
by
Arthur McGowan
(If you're FOR sticking scissors in a female's neck and sucking out her brains, you are PRO-WOMAN!)
To: kingattax
It would also result in many patrons not going out to movies. The last thing I want to see running across the screen is words, unless I was watching some sort of international movie that was not in English.
It would be far better to ensure Hollywood has that on the DVD’s for sale, if they don’t already.
3
posted on
09/15/2013 10:53:45 PM PDT
by
Jonty30
(What Islam and secularism have in common is that they are both death cults)
To: kingattax
Heh heh. Obama is now going after Hollywood.
Ah, Schadenfreude...
4
posted on
09/15/2013 10:57:22 PM PDT
by
piytar
(The predator-class is furious that their prey are shooting back.)
To: Jonty30
I was wondering if the words would show on the screen myself. I watched the video clip and two of the deaf women were wearing special glasses so I think only they see them which would be far better I think.
Now the blind and deaf can become brainwashed by Hollywood yay!
5
posted on
09/15/2013 10:57:53 PM PDT
by
funfan
To: Jonty30
With something like google glasses for the closed captioning and wireless headphones for the blind, you wouldn’t see or hear anything that you don’t today.
6
posted on
09/15/2013 10:58:10 PM PDT
by
Bob
To: Arthur McGowan
In TV terms, I think it is called “pay for view.”
I’m sure it is cheaper than actually going to the movies.
7
posted on
09/15/2013 10:59:33 PM PDT
by
JimmyMc
To: funfan
If the deaf are wearing special goggles, that wouldn’t be so bag. It’s not as though that would affect me, but it would put smaller theatres at a disadvantage, because they couldn’t afford this technology.
8
posted on
09/15/2013 11:00:52 PM PDT
by
Jonty30
(What Islam and secularism have in common is that they are both death cults)
To: kingattax
Couldn’t private companies offer an app that would do this and which could be bought by those who need it? Instead of demanding businesses install such expensive equipment? I support accommodating the disabled but this I would equate more with requiring a business make sure they have trained service dogs available for patrons rather than just requiring service dogs be allowed in with their disabled owner.
9
posted on
09/15/2013 11:03:07 PM PDT
by
lastchance
("Nisi credideritis, non intelligetis" St. Augustine)
To: kingattax
Sit the people who are hard of hearing next to the speakers, and the people who are seeing impaired up next to the screen.
10
posted on
09/15/2013 11:06:44 PM PDT
by
political1
(Love your neighbors)
To: kingattax
While the government is at it, they should also require a don't try this at home warning for every dangerous stunt.
11
posted on
09/15/2013 11:12:12 PM PDT
by
Zakeet
(Democrats haven't destroyed your freedoms ... you can still visit them at the Smithsonian)
To: political1
Sit the people who are hard of hearing next to the speakers, and the people who are seeing impaired up next to the screen.I like the way you think. I think I'll try that. Yeah, I have an idea!
Why don't we feed the homeless to the hungry?
12
posted on
09/15/2013 11:12:52 PM PDT
by
Jeff Chandler
(Don't blame me for McCain.)
To: kingattax
Listen!
Do you smell that?
13
posted on
09/15/2013 11:13:37 PM PDT
by
Vendome
(Don't take life so seriously, you won't live through it anyway)
To: kingattax
How about the rights of deaf and blind people to be airline pilots? Or the rights of atheists to be Catholic Priests? Or the rights of midgets to join the NBA?
14
posted on
09/15/2013 11:17:33 PM PDT
by
Ronin
(Dumb, dependent and Democrat is no way to go through life - Rep. L. Gohmert, Tex)
To: Jonty30
15
posted on
09/15/2013 11:18:58 PM PDT
by
funfan
To: Vendome
Why don't we feed the homeless to the hungry? Not a bad idea, though I suspect that the homeless are a little on the gamey side.
16
posted on
09/15/2013 11:19:13 PM PDT
by
fhayek
To: Ronin
How about the rights of deaf and blind people to be airline pilots? Or the rights of atheists to be Catholic Priests? Or the rights of midgets to join the NBA?....or how about the rights of idiots to run for political office? Oh never mind!
17
posted on
09/15/2013 11:22:45 PM PDT
by
Brandonmark
(OWCM is The new American Minority! 11.06.12 - Day of Infamy!)
To: political1
>"Sit the people who are hard of hearing next to the speakers, and the people who are seeing impaired up next to the screen."Sounds like a plan to me!
18
posted on
09/15/2013 11:25:24 PM PDT
by
rawcatslyentist
(Jeremiah 50:32 "The arrogant one will stumble and fall ; / ?)
To: Vendome
19
posted on
09/15/2013 11:46:43 PM PDT
by
kingattax
(America needs more real Americans.)
To: kingattax
I have poor eyesight myself (but am not blind), but it really stretches my imagination to see how theatres could be forced to accommodate blind people. You can’t make brail movies.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-43 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson