Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Nachum

I do not think the CVN is viable against an enemy for whom it poses an existential threat.

I know most don’t agree, and, obviously, we won’t find out until the shooting starts.


26 posted on 09/11/2013 9:30:55 AM PDT by Jim Noble (When strong, avoid them. Attack their weaknesses. Emerge to their surprise. N)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Jim Noble
“I do not think the CVN is viable against an enemy for whom it poses an existential threat.”

People that don't like CVNs speak of them as floating in the middle of the shooting, all alone. Couldn't be any further from the truth. Some say CVNs have not been tested in a close-in shooting match. By design, of course not. They project power from a distance while being defended by formidable air, surface and subsurface assets.

As for their “viability”, in the last 40 years there has hardly been major military action anywhere on the planet that has not included a CVN. There are a lot of US presidents that would attest to their viability. Not many foreign terrorists and dictators though, since many of them are dead.

36 posted on 09/11/2013 10:08:49 AM PDT by ryan71 (The Partisans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson