Skip to comments.
Vladimir Putin Puts John Kerry In Check On Syria
Business Insider ^
| 9 Sep 2013
| Michael Kelley
Posted on 09/09/2013 10:03:02 AM PDT by elhombrelibre
On Monday, U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry said Syria could avoid an American attack by turning over "every single bit of his chemical weapons to the international community in the next week."
Russia immediately jumped on the offer, as Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov said Moscow will urge Syria to place its chemical weapons under international control in a bid to avert military intervention.
This is a deft political move on Russia's part, especially since the State Department immediately walked back Kerry's comments by saying that he "was making a rhetorical argument about the impossibility and unlikelihood of Assad turning over chemical weapons he has denied he used."
(Excerpt) Read more at businessinsider.com ...
TOPICS: Editorial; Foreign Affairs; Russia
KEYWORDS: bho44; bhorussia; kerry; putin; soskerry; syria; yellowlineinthesnow
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-97 next last
To: elhombrelibre
What’s wrong with this Administration is both its wild ignorance of how the world functions and it’s inability to think - and then speak.
Kerry said that “America” (he speaks for me apparently) would back down if Assad would just let the international community maintain his chem weapons and then snidely (arrogantly) followed that up with, “but he won’t do that.”
An hour later, Assad says, “yeah, that sounds great.”
It makes everyone look about as stupid as I know they actually are.
Hey, Kerry - did you bother asking Assad first before you went on a maniacal war-footing????? Capital-D Dumba$$.
Statesman. These guys don’t know the word.
61
posted on
09/09/2013 10:59:09 AM PDT
by
Noamie
To: elhombrelibre
http://www.businessinsider.com/syrian-rebels-are-not-al-qaeda-2013-9
Notice how the lackey Business Insider pitches in to help out spreading the lie that the "sryian revolution" is a "hodge podge" of groups.
The new world order financial oligarchy has been working on this revolution for years through their "experts", think tanks, organizations, foundations, etc. Various events were publicly reported in the news, are easily available online, but most people are too goofy or lazy to find, read and analyze the stories.
The leadership of CIA is thoroughly NWO. The highest-ranking US politicians on both sides of the aisle are all NWO. They can all distance themselves from the idea of NWO control of the CIA because NWO "doesn't exist" - what a "crazy" idea.
The hot revolution is a CIA black op conducted through the CIA subsidiaries that are Turkish, Qatari and Saudi intelligence. The money-men in those countries are NWO lapdogs and they have provided the bulk of the financing so CIA did not have to show it anywhere on its books.
Sorry to burst bubbles, but the CIA leadership has always had off-the-books funds and operations. There have always been close ties to "the foundations" and the financial oligarchy that is NWO leadership. Makes sense, because OSS/CIA founding was by the same oligarchy, so it stands to reason they founded these organizations to help themselves. One can not begin to understand the real CIA without reading up on BCCI and researching enough to get a handle on their role and black operations in the illegal drug world. The largest illegal "drug lord" manufacturers operate under franchise of the financial oligarchs. The world's super-wealthy have always run the drug business. One of the first major opium traders was FDR's grandfather Warren Delano. This is why the "war on drugs" can be pursued by certain arms of the government and yet never seem to stop the big drug lords. Look up BCCI, specifically the report to the Senate by John Kerry and Hank Brown. Of course, being solidly NWO, Kerry could stall as much as possible, then, when the report was written, it could reveal enough to make regulators and banks look bad, but ultimately not provide enough to prosecute and thus close the can of worms on behalf of NWO. The real damning details thus never come out. But the report gives a glimpse for the "little people", who, if they take that with a lot of other information can perhaps begin to wake up and connect the dots. Well, one or two dots maybe, at least.
NWO's news media has endlessly chanted that all these "revolutions" are indigenous; it's not news, it's mind control. Repeat something enough and people start to believe it. All of these arab spring revolutions are the same as Syria; NWO->CIA->3rdparty->Terrorists operations.
Incidentally, Al-Jazeera is the CIA's muslim publication. It is owned and financed by the emir of Qatar.
THERE IS A REASON, folks, that the Bush family, other powerful US figures and the ruling elites of the UK are so friendly with the leading families of the Islamic nations.
Look at the links, look at the ties.
Anyone who thinks for one nanosecond that somehow banana republic muslim nations are "controlling" the US is intellectually smoking crack.
That's like saying Panama controls the US.
But you have to actually read some bits of true history to add two plus two and get four.
All these Islamic nations have been set up, propped up, torn down, replaced, in a constant cycle by the US since oil was found in those countries and Standard Oil first started making moves. Before that, the UK was more in the lead as NWO used the UK government to set up the middle east for constant turmoil for the forseeable future, as well as a great "farm team system" for breeding terrorists.
Politicians aren't really politicians in the sense that the little people think they are; they play politicians on TV. In reality, they work behind the scenes for NWO, receiving their orders from various "experts" and "backers".
62
posted on
09/09/2013 11:00:22 AM PDT
by
PieterCasparzen
(We have to fix things ourselves)
To: elhombrelibre
There might be no need for a vote on attacking Syria.
63
posted on
09/09/2013 11:00:28 AM PDT
by
Mike Darancette
(The Presidency is broken.)
To: bunster
Might be more like, what did Obama give up for Putin to ride in and save his sorry @$$
64
posted on
09/09/2013 11:00:51 AM PDT
by
Farnsworth
("The people have always some champion whom they set over them and nurse into greatness...This and no)
To: bunster
could Putin save Os behind?
That process is already well underway. The REAL question is, what is he expecting in return?
To: elhombrelibre
Great, now if Kerry gets another grain of rice stuck in his ass they'll give him
another Purple Heart and a Nobel peace prize.
66
posted on
09/09/2013 11:02:15 AM PDT
by
MaxMax
(If you're not pissed off, you're not paying attention)
To: bolobaby
No, I feel the same way at times. We need a “man” as president, not a boy-king
67
posted on
09/09/2013 11:03:17 AM PDT
by
Farnsworth
("The people have always some champion whom they set over them and nurse into greatness...This and no)
To: Buckeye McFrog; DarthVader
“could Putin save Os behind?
That process is already well underway. The REAL question is, what is he expecting in return?”
Just another piece of how brilliant a move this is by Putin. He gets 0bama and Kerry to pull their pants down on the world stage, and then gets to play the good guy who comes in to say “Hey buddy, your pants are down.”
Putin keeps Assad in power, maintains his natural gas monopoly in Europe, embarrasses the United States, AND puts a “you owe me one, pal” on 0bama all at the same time. And 0bama will be stupid enough to say “Sure; thanks.”
68
posted on
09/09/2013 11:09:47 AM PDT
by
henkster
(democrats will sacrifice the lives of our servicemen so 0bama doesn't look bad.)
To: DarthVader
Assad will not give up weapons that he does not have. Assad has plenty of chem to turn over to 'Int'l' control. This is what happens when your dips talk too much.
69
posted on
09/09/2013 11:13:57 AM PDT
by
xone
To: henkster
That pretty much sums it up! You are better than any ME “analyst” or whatever talking heads out there!
70
posted on
09/09/2013 11:15:46 AM PDT
by
gr8eman
(Ron Swanson for President!)
To: henkster
Buggery’s Saudi masters will not be happy with him and are not going to take this lying down and there will be hell to pay. Putin is just like Michael Corleone and will give him an offer he cannot refuse. The price may very well be resignation from office to step aside for Putin’s goal which is a crusade against Muslim fundamentalism.
71
posted on
09/09/2013 11:17:38 AM PDT
by
DarthVader
(Politicians govern out of self interest, Statesmen govern for a Vision greater than themselves)
To: elhombrelibre
How dare Putin diss Juan Skerry - who by the way served in Vietnam - about his position on Syria. To think this idiot could have been POTUS scares me as much as 0 bummer now.
72
posted on
09/09/2013 11:18:28 AM PDT
by
Arrowhead1952
(The Second Amendment is NOT about the right to hunt. It IS a right to shoot tyrants.)
To: DarthVader
Putin doesn’t want to replace 0bama. Making 0bama perform monkey-boy tricks is too much fun, and the crazy Joe Biden is too unpredictable.
But you are correct about the Saudis; they are going to wonder if their money spent buying 0bama’s phoney-baloney degrees was worth it. They just might tell their media whores that they can “leak” some of 0bama’s real past.
73
posted on
09/09/2013 11:26:59 AM PDT
by
henkster
(democrats will sacrifice the lives of our servicemen so 0bama doesn't look bad.)
To: tumblindice
“Hole in the mattress” by Mister Completely.
74
posted on
09/09/2013 11:27:01 AM PDT
by
tractorman
(I never miss a chance to tweak a liberal.)
To: henkster
75
posted on
09/09/2013 11:28:16 AM PDT
by
Riley
(The Fourth Estate is the Fifth Column.)
To: henkster
As much fun as it would be for him to bitch-slap Buggery regularly it looks like that he wants him gone and in the worst way. He is very serious about his anti-muslim crusade and wants someone capable who is liked minded whom he can respect and partner with as this undertaking requires teamwork and enormous resources both $$$ and military. To leave him leaves the situation with risks that are unacceptable. Putin is way too calculating, practical and ruthless to let this go on.
76
posted on
09/09/2013 11:40:59 AM PDT
by
DarthVader
(Politicians govern out of self interest, Statesmen govern for a Vision greater than themselves)
To: Red White and Blue patriot
Don’t bother trying to talk sense to people who are blinded by their hero worship of an unrepentant Soviet mass-murderer. In fact this move by KGB Putin comes across as pathetically desperate. Of course Assad will not give up his weapons. Putin is Assad’s bitch.
To: henkster; Red White and Blue patriot
“Id call this a decisive victory for Russia and Putin.”
Well said, but you forgot the part where Iran gets the bomb because a weak US does nothing. Iran dominates the Persian Gulf region as a Russian proxy.
78
posted on
09/09/2013 11:48:17 AM PDT
by
Owl558
(Those who remember George Santayana are doomed to repeat him)
To: Red White and Blue patriot
Looks more like Putin blinked.
79
posted on
09/09/2013 11:48:53 AM PDT
by
Revolting cat!
(Bad things are wrong! Ice cream is delicious!)
To: Tailgunner Joe
Dont bother trying to talk sense
80
posted on
09/09/2013 11:50:34 AM PDT
by
Revolting cat!
(Bad things are wrong! Ice cream is delicious!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-97 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson