To: SeekAndFind
Romney would have been a much better president than Obama. I think he would have really tried to take on the deficit using moderately conservative solutions. I’m not sure what he would have done in foreign policy. Pretty much every candidate says things and does the opposite — Example # 1 is Obama himself. Having said that, Romney certainly wasn’t some dream candidate. I haven’t seen one of those since, oh, about 1980.
28 posted on
09/05/2013 10:00:55 AM PDT by
Opinionated Blowhard
("When the people find they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic.")
To: Opinionated Blowhard
Yeah, but he lost. His campaign sucked just like McCain’s. Just like Dole’s. Don’t run GOP-e RINOS!!
30 posted on
09/05/2013 10:03:31 AM PDT by
Jim Robinson
(Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God!!)
To: Opinionated Blowhard
You are clueless about the Romney Agenda.
Gay Marriage by FORCE.
RomneyCARE/ObamaCARE by FORCE.
Romney even wanted Americans to pay for the healthcare
of Hezbollah.
If not for Romney, Obama and Soros would not be
running America for al Qaeda.
To: Opinionated Blowhard
I think he would have really tried to take on the deficit using moderately conservative solutions.
The problem with that opinion, is that Romney's record as Governor doesn't support that opinion and that is really all we had of any substance to judge him by.
Add to that his penchant of always taking a different position on each policy issue dependent on who he was talking to or which direction the political winds were currently blowing and even the "moderate conservative" policy positions he was positing during the 2012 campaign season couldn't be honestly believed.
He was a completely horrible candidate where the GOP was concerned.
Wrong history, wrong policy position, could not be trusted.
43 posted on
09/05/2013 10:17:05 AM PDT by
SoConPubbie
(Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson