[Lakeshark]

One of the points many have made is that the issue is not clear at all. I think the article shows why that is so. For a "conservative" to want to take out one of our best candidates over something that is not only not clear, is totally ignored by the demonrats, and has not one single court case supporting the "birther" (not using this as a pejorative) view seems totally insane to me.

Agreed, math is much easier.....

:-)

[noinfringers2]

One ,for the most part of life, has to make choices. As to this particular issue my choice is to hold to what I believe history tells me and shows me to be what the Founders meant by words and deeds. As a ‘birther’ from the beginning against Obama’s eligibility I hold to a belief that the strictest criteria for eligibility is needed to hold to the Constitution as I believe the Founders intended. I also believe such criteria are present in historical records. The birth eligibility ‘knot’ of ‘parents and soil’ fits my choice without any mental reservations or conditions.