Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Mr Rogers

Sure, sure, you don’t like the truth, so you kick the game board over and storm off hurling invectives. Why don’t you try and deal with the subject at hand, where the “natural” in “natural born citizen” is the opposite of the artificial born citizen created by laws enacted by men.


193 posted on 09/03/2013 8:50:10 PM PDT by WhiskeyX ( provides a system for registering complaints about unfair broadcasters and the ability to request a)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 189 | View Replies ]


To: WhiskeyX

The problem is you don’t even know why I posted those quotes.

They show that, at the time of the writing of the US Constitution, “natural born” subject or citizen was a part of normal legal speech, and that a natural born citizen is the American version of a natural born subject. When legal documents of the time use NBC & NBS interchangeably, then the meaning of NBS carries over into the meaning of NBC.

That is why, when the US Supreme Court wanted to know the ORIGINAL INTENT of NBC, they examined the common law meaning of NBS. There is no need for the Supreme Court to rule on NBC, because they already did so. In 1898.


196 posted on 09/03/2013 9:14:32 PM PDT by Mr Rogers (Liberals are like locusts...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 193 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson