Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: lentulusgracchus

Yes, the whole marriage angle was convoluted and suspicious. There are a number of arguments which can be made about the nature of the alleged Muslim marriage ceremony on Maui and the issue of the Kenyan spouse under tribal laws. The whole marriage issue is a moot point with respect to the citizenship, because the Hawaiian divorce proceedings decided parental status and child custody under Hawaiian law. The Hawaiian court decision may be rebuttable in a court of law, but has of course not occurred. In any event, hawaiian law and U.S. law nonetheless determined the child’s citizenship upon the father the Hawaiian divorce court acknowledged.

Even if no father had ever been established ofr Dunham’s child, any U.S. citizenship acquired would have been acquired by operation of law and not by nature as required to be a natural born citizen.


185 posted on 09/03/2013 7:17:35 PM PDT by WhiskeyX ( provides a system for registering complaints about unfair broadcasters and the ability to request a)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 176 | View Replies ]


To: WhiskeyX

Quite a few courts and state elections boards have ruled that Obama qualifies as a natural born citizen. No court or election board has ruled that he does not qualify.
Allen v. Obama, Arizona (2012)
Ankeny v. Daniels, Indiana (2009)
Fair v. Obama, Maryland (2012)
Farrar v. Obama, Georgia (2012)
Freeman v. Obama, Illinois (2012)
Galasso v. Obama, New Jersey (2012)
Jackson v. Obama, Illinois (2012)
Paige v. Obama, Vermont (2012)
Powell v. Obama, Georgia (2012)
Purpura, et. al. v. Obama, New Jersey (2012)
Strunk v. N.Y. Board of Elections, New York (2012)
Swensson v. Obama, Georgia (2012)
Taitz v. Obama (Quo Warranto), U.S. District Court, Washington, D.C.. (2010)
Tisdale v. Obama, U.S. District Court, Virginia (2012)
Voeltz v. Obama, Florida (2012)
Welden v. Obama, Georgia (2012)

For example: Allen v. Obama, Arizona Superior Court Judge Richard E. Gordon: “Arizona courts are bound by United States Supreme Court precedent in construing the United States Constitution, and this precedent fully supports that President Obama is a natural born citizen under the Constitution and thus qualified to hold the office of President. Contrary to Plaintiff’s assertion, Minor v. Happersett, 88 U.S. 162 (1874), does not hold otherwise.”—Pima County Superior Court, Tuscon, Arizona, March 7, 2012

Tisdale v. Obama, Judge John A. Gibney, Jr.: “It is well settled that those born within the United States are natural born citizens.”— Tisdale v. Obama, US District Court of the Eastern District of Virginia, January 23, 2012.


186 posted on 09/03/2013 7:29:49 PM PDT by Nero Germanicus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 185 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson