[Bigtigermike]

The final nail in the coffin?

Its Better to lose than to support Dem-lite candidates that are rammed down our throats

[amophys]

I myself have found myself increasingly attracted to the Robert Heinlein school of thought: “Political tags — such as royalist, communist, democrat, populist, fascist, liberal, conservative, and so forth — are never basic criteria. The human race divides politically into those who want people to be controlled and those who have no such desire. The former are idealists acting from highest motives for the greatest good of the greatest number. The latter are surly curmudgeons, suspicious and lacking in altruism. But they are more comfortable neighbors than the other sort.”

Maybe it is just me, but this is how I think people should start viewing political labels from here on in.

[Deb]

Yeah, lets fragment and guarantee Marxist rule for our children. The Left NEVER cannibalizes itself over purity. NEVER!

I just love you phony patriots who are too cowardly to actually be Republicans, standing around calling them RINOs and gutless.

The stand should be against the DEMOCRATS and our guys will work themselves out. It's no time to be breaking off into little smug groups of "purists" while the country is taken over!

[LibFreeUSA]

The House is under the control of the ‘Republican-wing’ of the Democrat party.

[Moonman62]

It’s been this way for years. It’s about time that more people are starting to notice.

[Razz Barry]

I'd rather lose than be party to the destruction of the country. The democrats and republicans will do their dirty deeds without my approval.

[EBH]

Oh just wait until 2014 and we’ll have the same load of cr_p thrown at us if we don’t vote for the candidate with the R behind his name...

It is like people here never learn!

Why bother voting anymore...the candidates are a farce and should be brought up on fraud charges or something.

BUT NO..... we can’t have that and your nonsupport makes you a traitor to the Republic.

I am so done with all of it.

[EternalVigilance]

There’s an apparent catch-22 in third party efforts. You need a large enough mass of voters to overcome the rigged game when it comes to ballot access. But you need ballot access to attract a large enough mass of voters.

We’ve solved that riddle.

For the last five years we’ve been laying the groundwork for what we call a “meta-party,” or, to put it simply, an organization that goes beyond party, to principle, while fully utilizing whatever is still viable or useful from the old way of doing things.

http://www.selfgovernment.us/be-a-leader.html

[x]

It's still the party of Cheney, Rumsfeld, and the Bushes.

Maybe it's more honest to carry on in that vein than to pretend to be opposed to foreign adventures (or amnesty for illegals).

[Ron H.]

Indeed WHY?!