To: C. Edmund Wright
if Paul and Cruz both run, expect a nasty dogfight in the grassroots. Previous examples of intramural viciousness ...
PatRobertson vs. Jack Kemp in ‘88
Huckabee vs. Brownback in ‘08 Iowa
and Bachmann Iowa ‘12 got a bit crude.
Rand-Paul not necessarily involved himself ... see his recent comments about Cruz citizenship ... but the paulistas like to freelance.
The Paulistas are strong enough in western NH to successfully undermine Cruz there. It would be best if Paul were to not run and, instead, endorse Cruz.
To: campaignPete R-CT
I can say some nice things (things I like) about Rand Paul, but I suspect he's been infected by some of his dad's foreign policy weaknesses. One other thing - there is something somehow feminine about his voice and his manner. I know he can't help that, but it's there and it won't help in a presidential campaign.
I have to say that I have much more confidence in Ted Cruz. I don't think that there's anyone else out there with his qualities.
Ted Cruz - 2016
159 posted on
09/02/2013 11:24:06 AM PDT by
Tau Food
(Never give a sword to a man who can't dance.)
To: campaignPete R-CT
if Paul and Cruz both run, expect a nasty dogfight in the grassroots. Previous examples of intramural viciousness ... PatRobertson vs. Jack Kemp in 88 Huckabee vs. Brownback in 08 Iowa and Bachmann Iowa 12 got a bit crude. Which is all so stupid and self defeating. What voters in primaries really want is a vision for beating the libs.....but consultants and candidates are often too stupid and too duped by conventional wisdom to figure this out. Newt proved this twice in 2011-12, and then he and his consultants got stupid too.....
173 posted on
09/02/2013 11:53:11 AM PDT by
C. Edmund Wright
(Tokyo Rove is more than a name, it's a GREAT WEBSITE)
To: campaignPete R-CT; C. Edmund Wright
Rand-Paul not necessarily involved himself ... see his recent comments about Cruz citizenship ... but the paulistas like to freelance.
The Paulistas are strong enough in western NH to successfully undermine Cruz there. It would be best if Paul were to not run and, instead, endorse Cruz.
It would be best that Rand Paul not run because he has his own Amnesty Proposal.
Any candidate who thinks Amnesty is a good thing cannot be trusted and does not have the health and welfare of this country at heart but his/her own political ambitions. This also means that such candidate does not care about what is best for the citizens he/she is supposed to be leading.
Furthermore, because of the destruction such policy would impose on the US, I can only consider Rand Paul, or anyone else that proposes Amnesty, a Traitor!
194 posted on
09/02/2013 12:21:04 PM PDT by
SoConPubbie
(Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson