Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TomGuy
Consider if this 9 acre plot is in the middle of a 200,000 acre coal field that is to strip mined.

If the mine is to be realized with out touching the 9 acres of substantially harm its value (law suit avoidance) the 9 acre plow would have to leave a substantial amount of land untouched. Also the company could not cut off access to the 9 acres so an access road to the property would have to be left untouched. Then you would have to worry about lawsuits concerning noise and dust. Power lines and other utilities would have to be maintained to the property.

If you think about the amount of land that would be given up to keep the 9 acres intact and accessible it makes the project very much more expensive.

14 posted on 09/01/2013 10:40:31 AM PDT by Pontiac (The welfare state must fail because it is contrary to human nature and diminishes the human spirit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: Pontiac

For those unfamiliar with above ground mining (strip mining is no longer used to mine coal), the land mined is almost always uninhabitable die to harsh slopes. However, mining companies are required by law to reclaim the land mined and as a result the land is landscaped so that it is prime real estate for housing developments, parks, and golf courses.


16 posted on 09/01/2013 10:59:41 AM PDT by TennTuxedo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson