Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: txrefugee
If conservatives learn to back one challenger, instead of splitting their vote among several candidates,

If conservative candidates would back down when it is apparent that they have no chance of winning maybe it would be easier. We should all remember how we got Mittens on the ballot, when he was a 30% candidate.

If Newt had dropped out of some of the primaries where he knew he had no chance what so ever of winning, it could have denied delegates to Mitt, and set up a two man race which Newt very likely would have pulled of the win.

Vanity is destructive. All the conservatives(?) in the race should have had a summit wherein they all agreed the goal was defeating Obozo, but they didn't.

33 posted on 09/01/2013 7:56:41 AM PDT by itsahoot (It is not so much that history repeats, but that human nature does not change.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: itsahoot
If conservative candidates would back down when it is apparent that they have no chance of winning maybe it would be easier.

It would be easier still if voters would stop throwing away their votes on candidates who have no chance of winning. It really comes down to the voters. They're the reason ol' Lamar has been a senator for so long.


34 posted on 09/01/2013 8:08:25 AM PDT by Cinnamontea
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson