“Soooo, I guess you missed the baby-killing, boy-raping part...Or were you planning to defend that?”
Uhhh, I’m not a member of the LP. And I don’t consider myself a libertarian, either. While I’m sympathetic to many of their views, particularly on guns and reduction of the size of government, their party’s official insistence in supporting infanticide is a nonstarter for me.
That said, there is a sizable minority of Libertarians within the LP who are pro-life. And I suspect that the majority of those who identify themselves as libertarian but who choose to not join the LP would cite infanticide as an underlying reason. Here is a link should you wish to further educate yourself: http://www.l4l.org/
Just like the pro-life democrats. Maybe they should differentiate themselves as pro-life or small "l" libertarians, otherwise they'll be labeled as such.
Of course that still leaves the "drug addled and boy-raping" position intact. Why would anyone want to create civil rights for the "gay death-style" child molesters?