Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Diego1618; xzins
This is why [Article II; Section I] differentiates between "Natural Born Citizen".....or "Citizen" (I won't say......."plain old" because some folks get upset at that).
Wait - no, it doesn't.

I see the problem now - you're looking at individual words while disregarding the context, cherry-picking nouns while ignoring the modifiers.

The emphasis isn't on "natural born citizen" and "citizen", as you claim:
[Article II; Section I U.S. Constitution]No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; (emphasis yours)
It's between natural born citizens and grandfathered citizens:
[Article II; Section I U.S. Constitution]No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; (emphasis mine)
That grandfather clause died, as an ongoing concern, sometime in the nineteenth century with the last person so covered. As they knew it would.

That leaves us not with the two types of people, as you claim - '"Natural Born Citizen".....or "Citizen"' - but one kind. No Person except a natural born Citizen shall be eligible to the Office of President. All American citizens at birth can aspire to the office.
695 posted on 09/02/2013 1:15:35 AM PDT by highball ("I never should have switched from scotch to martinis." -- the last words of Humphrey Bogart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 667 | View Replies ]


To: highball; Diego1618; xzins; Ladysforest; Sun; Jim Robinson
That leaves us not with the two types of people, as you claim - '"Natural Born Citizen".....or "Citizen"' - but one kind. No Person except a natural born Citizen shall be eligible to the Office of President. All American citizens at birth can aspire to the office.

Your logic is impeccable and you have stated the case very succinctly. You have stated in just a few short sentences what some legal scholar might state in a treatise of thousands of words.

Excellent post!

705 posted on 09/02/2013 7:01:07 AM PDT by P-Marlowe (There can be no Victory without a fight and no battle without wounds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 695 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson