Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: CodeToad

Since you cited a Congressional law this is easy - not a natural citizen.

They depend on positive (vs. natural) law for citizenship.

Does everyone just want to strike the word natural from Article II, Section 1?

1401 describe a ‘born citizen’. That is only half the equation.


63 posted on 08/30/2013 1:34:51 PM PDT by bluecat6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]


To: bluecat6

“They depend on positive (vs. natural) law for citizenship.”

So such thing as “positive law”. See my previous post about the needed use of “natural” in the Constitution.

“1401 describe a ‘born citizen’. That is only half the equation.”

Nope. “natural born citizen” = “citizen at birth”.


73 posted on 08/30/2013 1:55:57 PM PDT by CodeToad (Liberals are bloodsucking ticks. We need to light the matchstick to burn them off. -786 +969)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson