Ow! That hurts.
I’ll take another look if and when they get it to the SCOTUS and win.
.
BLACKMUN, J., Opinion of the Court
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
410 U.S. 113
Roe v. Wade
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
No. 70-18 Argued: December 13, 1971 --- Decided: January 22, 1973
Jane Roe (Norma McCorvey) Won this case. I do not believe that winning a case before the Supreme court necessarily makes someone correct. Especially the modern courts.
This case is one of the most blatant examples of a wrongly decided case. It's so bad, many Liberal lawyers won't even try to defend it's conclusions.
Among the other Terrible Supreme court decisions are Wickard v Fillburn (A Farmer can't grow wheat for his own cows.) Kelo v New London (A city can seize someone's property and give it to someone else) Lawrence v Texas (Sodomy is a protected right) and of course the Latest ruling on Obamacare. (It's a tax, and therefore legal)
At this point, i'm not seeing how amateurs could do a worse job.
Keep up the good work for the other side, but I sure wish you would do it somewhere else. We’re in the middle of a rebellion here.
We have no comprehension creds.
Even when multiple Congresspersons agree on at least one thing, and state it over and over in front of the appropriate committees - that to be Constitutionally eligible one has to be born on U.S. soil, folks here and elsewhere who are huge fans of Cruz ignore that willingly.
Just as it’s ignored by some “birthers” that if Stanley Ann lied about the baby daddy being Sr., and wasn’t “really” married to him (his being a bigamist may/would have nullified any marriage like that here in the US)then obama Jr. would indeed be a nbc. So what if Davis or one of those other men fathered Jr. - he would simply be a nbc, albeit an illegitimate infant.
Notice that I am NOT adding any personal opinions or emotional spin on that nbc topic at all?
It’s because I can appreciate that my opinion - the strictest possible meaning of the nbc clause, may not turn out to be something I find definitive period correct proof of. Well, what I’d consider would answer the question for ME with absolutely no interpretation possible by anyone anywhere! !!! :)
But I HAVE found definitive proof that our most elite, elected lawmakers concur that to be nbc one must at least have been born in the U.S. They want to do away with that requirement so badly that they have tried over and over to get an amendment passed. Again that is a fact of very recent history and NOT my opinion. No emotion involved.