Sham, what an absurd comment. Let's assume for a second that Jim is wrong on the NBC clause (he is not) - it would still be simply preposterous and frankly silly to equate that to "compromise." And let's, for the sake of argument, say he did compromise because he wanted Cruz to win badly. Your comment is still ridiculous, in that in any large contract, you cannot void the entire thing by violation of one small part.
In other words, you are very self aggrandizing to think you and your merry band of curmudgeons hold all universal truth in one small jot and tittle. Just absurd indeed.
I’ll stand my ground, anchored by the truth and the Constitution. If you wish to blow away in the wind, be my guest.